Thursday, June 30, 2011

Review - Sailing to Sarantium

I mentioned previously that Guy Gavriel Kay is one of my favorite authors.  In that post, I noted that he really does his research, when it comes to historical settings (names and some details may be changed, but the feel of it is quite real), and that his language is beautiful.  I think that a good deal of the fantasy (and sometimes otherworldly) feel of Kay's novels stems from the language.  (For what it's worth, the words are not always beautiful -- one character has a temper and a sometimes foul mouth, but the curses are creative rather than crude.)

This book is no exception, and is another solid effort by Kay.  It takes place in the same world as many of his other books, but in a different set of countries (something like the ruins of the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire).  It follows a mosaicist who travels to Sarantium to decorate the dome of a new cathedral.  Side stories include a freed slave, a man who hires himself out as a servant to travelers, a young queen, and chariot racers, among others.

One thing I notice about this book, in contrast to others I've read (by other authors) is that even though the main character (Crispin) is a craftsman, the descriptions of his craft are not boring.  (L.E. Modesitt, Jr., could take a lesson here.  Every time I read about Lerris making furniture or Kharl making barrels, I cringe.)  Perhaps it's the way the descriptions are brought in, as observations about light or spirited debates about technique.  Sometimes the debates have dire consequences.  The descriptions are part of the story, and they add depth, without being there just to add depth.

A few too many of the characters are a little too perfect.  Crispin says a lot of things that could get him into trouble, but always manages to talk his way out, solve the puzzle that no one else could, be the best at his craft, know the answer to everything -- even save his own life when attacked in a bathhouse.  The Emperor during the bulk of the story (not the prologue) is similarly able; he has discourses about all manner of subjects in person and by post, and doesn't appear to need any sleep.  (He does have some flaws, such as not apparently paying soldiers so that he can fund his building projects, and a violent response to riots, and an ambition -- not fleshed out well enough in this novel, but there is a sequel -- to retake the Western part of the old empire.  I'm assuming we'll hear more about this in the next novel: Lord of Emperors: Book Two of the Sarantine Mosaic.)

There's a little magic, a little conflict between paganism and the Jaddite faith (basically Christianity re-labeled).  Perhaps because the religions in Kay's world are basically thinly-veiled versions of humanity's real religions, their practitioners very much like historical social groups, they're much better done than in most fantasy novels.  They feel real because, in most cases, they are real.  (The Kindath are clearly meant to be Jews and thus their worship of two moon goddesses is a little different, but even so.  But that's more at issue in The Lions of al-Rassan.)

Unusually for Kay, this book has a sequel, which I'm reading now.  (His Fionavar Tapestry series was a trilogy but most of his other novels, while set in the same world, are standalone.)  Perhaps that's why I'm not 100% satisfied with the ending, but since I already had the sequel, and immediately picked it up, this wasn't a huge problem.  Another reason I feel a little equivocal about the ending is that there is an interlude with the young Western Queen Gisel, whom we met at the beginning and haven't heard from sense.  Her reappearance is a bit abrupt, and interrupts the flow of events in Sarantium.  I guess she has to get to Sarantium for the second book, though.

The world feels real, though.  We meet cooks, prostitutes, artisans, slaves, priests, soldiers, an alchemist, charioteers, nobles, and others.  The court politics feel real -- not that I am an expert on that, by any means.  The chariot races in the Hippodrome are exciting and not predictable, and it's interesting how Hippodrome factions spill over into real life.  (Maybe it's not Ben-Hur because it's not so visual, but the racing is well-done.)

It's probably not my favorite book by Kay (that honor is shared, so far, to The Lions of al-Rassan and Tigana) but it is very good, better than a lot of what I've read lately, and I would wholeheartedly recommend Sailing to Sarantium: Book One of the Sarantine Mosaic.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Fun with Words

If you're like me, you love to write.  (I'm working on a novel and I have five blogs at last count.)  You love words, putting words together, rearranging words, etc.

Here are a couple of language-related websites that I always get a kick out of.

Bad Translator: This site repeatedly translates a phrase you type in between English and other languages available on Google translate.  The more iterations you choose (maximum 56), the funnier it gets.
  • Starting phrase: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times."
  • Ending phrase (after 56 translations): "Method and more frequent."
  • Starting phrase (from the back of Sailing to Sarantium: Book One of the Sarantine Mosaic): "Sarantium is the golden city: holy to the faithful, exalted by the poets, jewel of the world, and heart of an empire."
  • Ending phrase (after 56 translation): "Sarantium, Holy Land, and poet pearl hard, Fidel government."
The Internet Anagram Server:This site will take any phrase you type in and generate a list of anagrams.  Here are some examples based on Terry Brooks character names (which are pretty silly anyway).
  • Flick Ohmsford: Cliffs Dork Ohm, Kirsch Mold Off, Shlock Mod Riff
  • Cinnaminson: Manics Inn No, Conman In Sin
  • Rimmer Dall: Lard Elm Rim, Mall Red Rim
  • Jerle Shannara: A Renal Jars Hen, Anal Jars Hen Re
  • Panterra Qu: Quarter Nap, Par Qua Rent, Parquet Ran
I always suspected Terry Brooks names were random collections of letters anyway.  Play around with it long enough, and you'll find some good ones.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Favorite Authors (Possible Spoilers)

I feel like I've spent a lot of time trashing books and authors on here.  Well, maybe not trashing, but pointing out flaws.  I think I promised at some point in the past to list my favorite authors.  Here they are, in no particular order:
  • Stephen R. Donaldson: Like many people, I had a hard time getting through the first book, especially after the rape scene.  (I don't necessarily feel like this is a spoiler because it happens really early on.)  One could argue that his language is from the Joseph Ducreux school (see yesterday's post for an explanation and a link).  And some of the names are a little out of place (Lord Kevin, Lord Foul the Despiser).  In spite of that, I really love his Thomas Covenant books.  I've read the The First Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever and The Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant several times each, and I will probably do the same when the Last Chronicles are finished.  I feel like the Land is a place that's brought to life extremely well.  It's one fantasy setting I'd actually like to visit, to see the Wraiths of Andelain and the Ranyhyn, to eat aliantha berries, etc.
  • Steven Erikson: What I love about the Malazan Book of the Fallen (see a previous post for a listing of his Malazan books) is that it is SO complex and interconnected, and he doesn't tell you everything (contrast Terry Goodkind, who tells you how Richard and Kahlan met in like every single book) in advance.  This gives these books excellent value the second time around, as well, although with the lengths of them, it may require a serious investment of time.  It is really interesting to go back to Gardens of the Moon knowing who Shadowthrone and Cotillion are from the beginning, or Memories of Ice knowing who Artanthos is from the beginning.  Some characters (e.g. Hetan) meet tragic ends.  Others seem to but maybe don't (Whiskeyjack, Coltaine).  Sure, some of the language is cheesy and gamer-like, or downright crude, but the scope of the story is downright massive.  (I haven't read The Crippled God yet, I'm psyching myself up for that particular investment of time...)
  • Glen Cook: I like the Black Company books a bit better than the Dread Empire books (see this earlier post for a list of Glen Cook titles I own), and I am enjoying the Instrumentalities of the Night series as well (maybe it's immature but I laughed out loud, for a long time, at the fart scene in Surrender to the Will of the Night).  Cook's novels are gritty and dark and matter-of-fact and I love that.  There are no unnecessary details.  I can tell from reading, especially the later Black Company books, and the Instrumentalities books, that Cook enjoys reading history, and uses it to help build a world with believable groups of people, believable inter-group conflict, etc.
  • Guy Gavriel Kay: Kay is a later addition to this list.  Like Cook, you can tell he does his research.  But his language is perhaps my favorite thing; it's rare for me to find myself actually moved by the language in a novel, but if anyone is capable of that, Kay is.  Tigana and The Lions of al-Rassan are two of my favorites so far; I've read less of Kay's work than the others on the list, but I think I have all of it on my shelf now (I haven't gotten to "K" on the library list yet) and I'm actually reading Sailing to Sarantium: Book One of the Sarantine Mosaic at the moment.  Another thing I enjoy about Kay's work is that not everyone has a happy ending; people you think will end up together in the end, take other paths, sometimes tragic ones.
There are probably a few honorable mentions.  George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire is good.  Can't wait for A Dance with Dragons, actually.  Carol Berg, from my favorite female authors post probably makes it into this group, as well.

    Saturday, June 25, 2011

    Multiple Viewpoints

    I promised some of this blog would be about writing fantasy fiction, not just reading it. One thing I've been thinking about lately is writing from multiple viewpoints. Lots of authors do this, but some do it better than others. Of the three books I've reviewed on this blog, Peter Orullian's The Unremembered: Book One of The Vault of Heaven does it better than either of the two by Elizabeth Moon (Oath of Fealty and Kings of the North).  Although Moon gets a bit better in the second of those two volumes.  And I'm not saying that Peter Orullian is the best ever, just that Wendra and Tahn actually do sound like different people, for example.  (Whereas Dorrin, Arcolin, and Phelan really don't.)

    And that's what I worry about, my characters sounding the same.  My viewpoint characters are racially and ethnically diverse -- black, white, and something which would be considered Indian or South Asian in our own world, as well as biracial individuals.  They are male and female, old and young, geographically isolated and city dwellers, gay and straight.  They are of varying social statuses, from priests and kings (or princesses) to clerks and prostitutes and poor villagers and members of traveling caravans.  Yeah, I have a lot of viewpoint characters.  The book will have a cast of hundreds (probably not thousands) when I'm done, although of course not all of those will be viewpoint characters.

    The details of the characters' lives are obviously very different.  But I don't know how that translates into their personalities, the way they see the world, the way they respond during crises or answer simple questions.  In some sense, action bespeaks personality.  But words are important too.  (Don't worry, I'm staying away from the artificial flowery Joseph Ducreux school of fantasy dialogue.  Well, I don't think it's officially been called the Joseph Ducreux school before, but that's always what I thought of when reading books where the characters' speech is TOO formal.  If you have no idea what I'm talking about, click on the link a few lines above, in this paragraph.  Yes, I spend too much time on Memebase.)

    Right now my focus is on getting words down on the page.  If I edit too much now, I'll never get finished.  This is one reason I'm writing by hand.  (I should hit 400 handwritten pages by this weekend!)  But I'm going to have to re-read this entire blog when I get it done, and typed into the computer, to see all the issues I've come up with that need to be addressed during editing.  I suppose I should be glad there's a record of it somewhere, at least.

    Single viewpoint novels can be good (Stephen R. Donaldson does this with the Thomas Covenant books), but are not really amenable to the sort of story I want to tell right now.  I have some ideas for unrelated books, if I ever get to them, that may be single-viewpoint books, actually.  But that's a long way down the road.

    Friday, June 24, 2011

    My Fantasy Library - E

    I find myself strangely lacking in inspiration today, so I'm going to post another list of books I own.  I'll start thinking about it now, and I should have something a bit more engaging for tomorrow.


    David Eddings
    Kate Elliott
     James Enge
    Steven Erikson
    Ian C. Esslemont